School AI Policies & Writing Guidelines

Instructor discretion. Use of AI tools is generally restricted unless explicitly permitted by the instructor in the syllabus.

Honor Code applies. Generative AI tools cannot be used to bypass the learning goals or represent machine output as one's own work.

Constructive collaboration. AI tools are treated like tutoring resources; usage must be disclosed and credit given appropriately.

Strict academic integrity. Generative AI is prohibited unless specified by the professor. Submitting AI text as own is plagiarism.

Course-by-course policies. General ban on submitting AI outputs for credit, but instructors are encouraged to teach critical evaluation of AI.

Individual instructor authority. Faculty determine what level of AI support is appropriate for their subject matter.

Honor Code guidelines. AI tools are forbidden during examinations and assignments unless instructors explicitly outline exceptions.

Faculty discretion. AI usage policies vary by school and class. Students must consult the syllabus before utilizing AI.

Emphasis on critical thinking. AI tools are prohibited for graded work unless instructors state otherwise. Attribution is mandatory.

Academic integrity guidelines. AI tools are considered outside help and require explicit approval and disclosure.

Three-tier policy system (Forbidden, Allowed with Citation, Fully Integrated). Standard policy is forbidden unless stated.

Course syllabus dictates policy. AI is allowed as a research aid in some departments but prohibited for direct generation.

Ethics-first framework. AI tools should be used to support, not replace, human thinking. Rules are set by individual divisions.

Community Standard applies. Submitting AI output as own work violates the commitment to honest scholarship.

Honor System applies. Students must not take unfair advantage of others, which includes unauthorized use of AI assistants.

Student Conduct Code applies. Academic dishonesty covers representing AI-generated outputs as original human work.

Instructor discretion. General guidelines require transparent disclosure if AI assists in any stage of the creative process.

Honor System guidelines. Faculty specify whether AI is allowed, prohibited, or encouraged on an assignment-by-assignment basis.

Responsible exploration. AI is supported as a collaborative tool, but students must demonstrate active engagement and cite AI usage.

Syllabus rules apply. AI is generally prohibited for writing tasks unless instructors provide guidelines on its integration.

Academic Honesty Guidelines. Generative AI tools cannot be used to substitute for student writing or coding without consent.

Collaborative learning model. AI is allowed for brainstorming and proofreading, but submitting AI drafts for credit is prohibited.

Honor Code guidelines. Students must complete all coursework themselves unless AI is explicitly incorporated into the curriculum.

Academic Conduct Code. Generative AI is prohibited for generating assignments unless the professor has given prior written authorization.

Academic Integrity policy. Students must perform their own academic work. AI output submission is treated as unauthorized aid.

Instructor discretion. General expectation is that work submitted represents the student's own effort and learning process.

Student Code guidelines. Submitting AI-generated text or code without instructor authorization violates academic integrity policies.

Honor Code guidelines. AI tools are prohibited for graded deliverables unless course instructors outline explicit allowances.

District-wide guidelines. Students must submit original writing. Generative AI is prohibited for writing assignments.

Academic integrity guidelines. The school restricts generative AI for all assignments unless explicitly integrated into the lesson plan.

Original work requirements. Students are expected to draft all reports and essays themselves. AI generation is considered cheating.

Honor Code policy. AI tools are banned for all writing and coding assignments unless the instructor provides written authorization.

Honor System guidelines. AI use is regulated by each instructor. Unauthorized use is treated as receiving unapproved help.

Honor Code applies. Faculty specify course-specific policies. Generative AI cannot be used to submit unoriginal work for credit.

Academic integrity rules. AI tools cannot be used to generate assignment solutions, essays, or projects.

Academic Honesty Policy. The use of generative AI to write essays, paragraphs, or answers is classified as unauthorized assistance.

Strict policy on AI. Students must submit original writing. Generative AI writing is treated as academic dishonesty.

Honor Code guidelines. Generative AI tools are considered external resources; use requires disclosure and instructor approval.

Academic Integrity policy. Faculty determine how AI fits learning objectives. Standard rule is no AI generation unless specified.

Honor System applies. Generative AI tools are classified as unauthorized aid unless the syllabus specifies exceptions.

Honor System jurisdiction. Submitting AI-generated text or code as original human work violates the Honor Code commit.

Academic Code guidelines. Students must produce their own academic work. AI usage is regulated by course syllabi.

Academic Honor Principle. AI tools must not be used to generate papers or assignments unless the instructor specifies otherwise.

Honor Code guidelines. Generative AI tools are classified as outside help and require explicit permission and attribution.

Academic Integrity policy. Generative AI is prohibited for generating assignments unless the professor has given prior authorization.

Academic Integrity policy. AI-generated submissions represent unauthorized collaboration unless explicitly authorized in the syllabus.

Code of Academic Conduct. Generative AI is prohibited for generating assignments unless specified by the professor.

Honor Code guidelines. Generative AI tools are prohibited for writing assignments unless specified by the instructor.

Academic Honesty Policy. The use of generative AI to write essays, paragraphs, or answers is classified as unauthorized assistance.

Academic Integrity policy. Students must perform their own academic work. AI output submission is treated as unauthorized aid.